Bush press conference disrupts prime-time TV viewing pleasure, whines liberal media

Here's a story of depression, vitriolic hate, and the extreme depths to which a human being is capable of sinking.

Dan Froomkin covered the Bush press conference, and wrote an enormous report as anti-Bush, anti-conservative and anti-American as one will ever see.

What's it titled?

"Not Exactly Must-See TV".

I'm sorry Dan -- did Bush's unveiling of his vastly important agenda, his effort to de-propagandize his citizenry oppressed by the Liberal Media, disrupt your viewing of Will and Grace? Or Queer Eye For The Straight Guy?

How about a Dan Froomkin version entitled Queer Eye For The Hate Guy, in which Dan walks around and nonchalantly writes elongated reports about things that threaten to mess with his socialist utopian vision.

American media just LOVES Fidel Castro!

Seeing the coverage of Fidel Castro's latest Communist policy put into effect, you'd think he'd died and went to Commie Heaven.

Well, America's leftist media sure seem to have died, and they're treating Castro like a Communist Saint.

Why? Well, he's implemented the Liberal Elite's #1 Goal, raising the minimum wage. Not just raising it, but doubling it in sheer ejaculatory Stalinist fashion.

Everyone from BusinessWeek to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer is bathing Castro in a celebratory glow, neglecting to mention even one of his crimes (or even the fact that he's a Communist!). It's the Liberal Media at work, and it's a shame that even "Business"Week is rolling in the Commie filth.

Democratic political gain? No, only Tom DeLay, liberal media enemy

Fair-and-balanced commentator David Limbaugh offers up a great point:

A recently released poll of Tom Delays constituents shows that while he still has a favorable rating at home, his unfavorables are growing. But given the media lambasting Delay has been taking this is hardly surprising. What struck me more about the report, in the Houston Chronicle, is its statement that "nearly half of those polled said he intervened (in the Schiavo case) for political gain."

My question is: when is the last time you can remember any poll anywhere inquiring into whether any Democrat did something for political gain? Just curious.

The link to that biased, despicable story is here. You'd think that Houston media would be, well, a little more in the center -- but no, this is more proof that the entire liberal, wherever in America it may be, hates the country that allows it the opportunity to exude its vile plumes of vitriol.

New York Times: The UN is to be trusted, apparently

Hey guys, remember the United Nations? That putrid, America-hating organization with the Oil-For-Food scandal hanging over its head, the evil Coffee Annan as its leader, and, had things gone according to plan, Saddam Hussein still in power and in cahoots with the dreadful organization?

Well, they're apparently the be-all and end-all when it comes to public policy.

Lawrence K. Altman, the "journalist" behind this "article", makes three major mistakes that no fair-and-balanced journalist would make:
-trusts the UN
-quotes a UN official
-writes up a story about the UN without mentioning the Oil For Food scandal
-forgets to mention that if the UN had its way, Saddam would still be gassing Kurds to this very day
-does not mention how completely and utterly leftist Bill Gates is, which again shows what I'd like to term the leftist media's 'Power of Omission' -- simple neglect of facts.

You'll see this 'Power of Omission' in action whenever and wherever a rubbish product of the Far-Left Mainstream Media is sold (or passed out as communist leaflets).

Also, I believe Lawrence K. Altman is what you get when you cross Dan Rather and a sixth-grade science textbook.

Liberal media interjects opinion contrary to Bush when "reporting" on Saudi Arabia

Here, a supposed news article from the Philadelphia Daily News.

Look at how the supposed reporter interjects his opinion:

The academy is funded by the Saudi government, a supposed ally of the United States in the fight against terrorism.

A supposed ally? President Bush consistently makes it clear that Saudi Arabia is a full-fledged ally in the War on Terror -- yet, clearly, the liberal media's job is to contradict what the President says, whenever possible, especially when supposedly reporting on the War on Terror (the mere idea of which the liberal media shuns).

Of course, the supposed reporter then interjects a fact oft used by liberal pundits and haters of nations participating in Bush's War on Terror:

Fifteen of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers were Saudi, although the oil-rich nation is a close ally of the Bush administration.

You'd think Howard Dean himself were writing this supposedly unbiased news report.

Then, the supposed reporter paints the brightest picture possible of this would-be presidential assassin:

But friends, family and attorneys for Abu Ali paint a radically different picture of the defendent and how he came to be charged in the case.

I will spare you the details, but if you want to see how heroic Abu Ali and his family are, read the supposed news report.

American, or Arab-American?

The biased American media loves terror and hates Bush -- here's more proof, from VDare.

Regarding the Arab-American, Bush-hating terrorist bastard (er, sorry, "American") currently on trial in Virginia:

Chances of getting this blunder fixed are not high if the dishonesty and lack of integrity of the media’s handling of the facts are anything to judge by. Consider the introductory descriptions:

“An American Student” -San Francisco Chronicle

“A 23 year old American” - New York Daily News

“A Virginia Man” - Newsday

“A Virginian” - Los Angeles Times (Take that Robert E. Lee!)

“A US citizen” - Chicago Tribune

“A Houston native and Virginia high school valedictorian” - Houston Chronicle (A twofer of misrepresentation – he only spent a couple of years after birth in Houston and his high school was distinctly unusual.)

Given the factual subtleties here, it does take a certain amount of journalistic professionalism to present the truth. The overseas media did the job:

“Arab-American” The Scotsman

“An American citizen of Arab descent” - The Australian

While America’s Big media are too craven or dishonest to state facts accurately, how can the country’s immigration (or Middle Eastern) problems be addressed?

Kudos, America-loving bloggers, for ridding America of Dan Rather and Eason Jordan!

And we're back, after a rather long "break". Don't worry, The Media Elite Blog is still back up and at 'em, ready to explore the various fanatical facets of the anti-democratic American media.

Dan Rather is now gone thanks to us (well, not technically "gone" yet, as he's still spitting ruthless anti-Bush rhetoric towards our naive children on a daily basis -- but he'll be gone soon enough)... and now what I like to call the Online Freedom Corps (ie. moderate, fair & balanced bloggers such as I) have gotten rid of another cog in the machine, CNN's disgustingly putrid Eason Jordan, a man whose leftist rants rival those of Dan Rather or even Ted Kennedy!

Great job everyone.

Only thousands more to go! Lets keep working to rid the media of leftisism, anti-American paranoia, and Ted Kennedy-hugging propagandaism, folks.

Where's the media on the Dan Rather story?

Where?

Nowhere. That's where. They can't fathom facing up to the reality of the liberal elitism apparatus that has taken shape in their stratosphere and still continues to progressively gain strength and propaganda-pushing prominence.

Here, just look at how little coverage Dan Rather's rather newsworthy anti-Bush actions and motives have gotten in your media:

Search Google News for stories including the phrases "Dan Rather" and "extreme liberal bias".

After all, why would the leftist media be concerned with their own lefticism?