New York Times: The UN is to be trusted, apparently

Hey guys, remember the United Nations? That putrid, America-hating organization with the Oil-For-Food scandal hanging over its head, the evil Coffee Annan as its leader, and, had things gone according to plan, Saddam Hussein still in power and in cahoots with the dreadful organization?

Well, they're apparently the be-all and end-all when it comes to public policy.

Lawrence K. Altman, the "journalist" behind this "article", makes three major mistakes that no fair-and-balanced journalist would make:
-trusts the UN
-quotes a UN official
-writes up a story about the UN without mentioning the Oil For Food scandal
-forgets to mention that if the UN had its way, Saddam would still be gassing Kurds to this very day
-does not mention how completely and utterly leftist Bill Gates is, which again shows what I'd like to term the leftist media's 'Power of Omission' -- simple neglect of facts.

You'll see this 'Power of Omission' in action whenever and wherever a rubbish product of the Far-Left Mainstream Media is sold (or passed out as communist leaflets).

Also, I believe Lawrence K. Altman is what you get when you cross Dan Rather and a sixth-grade science textbook.